Harry Kane known now to be 'The Man with the Midas Touch' is having a fine run of form with Tottenham Hotspur this season and is already been hyped and highly overrated by football pundits. Young and classy Kane has 29 goals for Spurs so far this season with His first International goal for England when he came on as a substitute making it 30 goals in total to his name this season. It's totally asburd when Football pundit 'Rodney Marsh' said "If Eliquiam Mangala is worth £30millon then Kane is worth £100million all day", and went on to say he felt Harry Kane is better than Angel Di Maria. How could a young lad still playing under 21's in England in just his first season been used consistently as a striker with 29 goals to his name been compared to Angel Did Maria with 87 assist in 190 matches while playing for real Madrid. Of course players with time do have hiccups with highs and lows which could be as a result of external factors relating to off-field plays. Angel Di Maria is adapting to new environment with new players and new language, so it may not be rosy for him now but certainly has proven to be a fine player. The young lad 'Kane' is superb no doubt, but he hasn't been given yet the 'litmus test'. He hasn't played in various competitions in all wheather with different atmosphere as regarding the Champions league, European League, World Cup etc. Kane may have tested all parts of the pitch in England, has he done it abroad consistently. Patience with time, learning and experience with maturity and consistently been able to deliver when called up should be highly considered for the young lad. These and many more should be considered before been able to make comparisons with Tested and Proven Players. Tottenham already will be scratching their itching palms at the moment knowing fully well how good they are doing business with their best players. Is Kane worth been valued now at any cost??
